| Topic |
 |
RE: A Couple New Features in Active Forums 4.2.5.
I understood Yes, that will be coming soon.
by Will Morgenweck in Will's Blog on 09 Apr 2010 04:33 PM
|
|
|
RE: A Couple New Features in Active Forums 4.2.5.
I am sorry for not being clear. I was referring about having the topic title in the url something like - /www.Activemodules.com/forum/A couple new features in Active Forums 4.2.5.aspx
by Frozen DNN in Will's Blog on 09 Apr 2010 04:27 PM
|
|
|
RE: A Couple New Features in Active Forums 4.2.5.
@Mark It should still work with DNN 4.8.4. However, you should consider reviewing the list of security issues in older versions of DotNetNuke. @browe68 and @Frozen DNN The post topic has always been present in the page title. We will be pr ...
by Will Morgenweck in Will's Blog on 09 Apr 2010 02:45 PM
|
|
|
RE: A Couple New Features in Active Forums 4.2.5.
Hi Will, So am I understanding that this will no longer work in version DNN 4.8.4 ? Thanks, Mark
by Mark Gordon in Will's Blog on 09 Apr 2010 02:37 PM
|
|
|
RE: A Couple New Features in Active Forums 4.2.5.
@ browe68: If I remember it correctly, its coming in AF 5. Will?
by Frozen DNN in Will's Blog on 09 Apr 2010 02:00 PM
|
|
|
RE: A Couple New Features in Active Forums 4.2.5.
Thanks Will... A follow up - "While this still isn't our ultimate URL solution" - can you tell us what is? Will there be an option to make the Post Topic appear in the URL/Page Title or is this currently possible?
by browe68 in Will's Blog on 09 Apr 2010 12:58 PM
|
|
|
A Couple New Features in Active Forums 4.2.5.
We don't usually introduce new features in patch releases. In this particular situation, I wanted to make sure all Active Forums 4.2 customers received the patch and didn't want to hold these new features for another release. Most ...
by Will Morgenweck in Will's Blog on 09 Apr 2010 12:45 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
I am just looking at the latest ActiveSocial site (1.3 I assume and I don't think this is going to be a problem anymore - it looks like it uses HREF anchors instead of querystring params (eg. http://www.activesocial.com/Members/Profile/tabid/57/asu ...
by Smart-Thinker in General Discussion on 14 Dec 2009 07:54 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
Another way to improve this problem will be the Canonical URL feature - Ifinity has a Canonical URL module which you can drop on any page and it works really well (when you have 500 pages!!). Ventrian took a different route and implemented it direct ...
by Smart-Thinker in General Discussion on 09 Dec 2009 09:18 AM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
I can say for sure that duplicate content is an issue. About 2 months ago, my StomperNet mentor saw almost all of his Google page 1 keywords drop off to about page 6 or worse in his eComm store. His site has been operating for several years and this ...
by Cliff Hammock in General Discussion on 09 Dec 2009 08:57 AM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
I agree with you 100%.
by Tareq in General Discussion on 09 Dec 2009 07:39 AM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
Hmm - yes, it's hard to say exactly what Google do and don't like - but the fact that duplicate pages show up in the SiteMaster tools imply that they don't encourage it. Duplicates are based on a number of factors - I would imagine the primary b ...
by Smart-Thinker in General Discussion on 08 Dec 2009 11:06 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
Posted By Smart-Thinker on 08 Dec 2009 08:55 PM Posted By Tareq on 08 Dec 2009 11:44 AM When I go in different tabs the page title is always same. If we can also have control over meta tags and keywords that will be even better but most important i ...
by Tareq in General Discussion on 08 Dec 2009 10:25 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
Posted By Tareq on 08 Dec 2009 11:44 AM When I go in different tabs the page title is always same. If we can also have control over meta tags and keywords that will be even better but most important is unique Page Title(According to Matt Cutt) Y ...
by Smart-Thinker in General Discussion on 08 Dec 2009 07:55 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
Personally I like separate tabs with unique url for each tabs. It is already there. Only thing I would like to see is more control over the page title. When I go in different tabs the page title is always same. 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
by Will Morgenweck in General Discussion on 08 Dec 2009 05:11 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
Posted By Tareq on 08 Dec 2009 11:44 AM If we can also have control over meta tags and keywords that will be even better but most important is unique Page Title(According to Matt Cutt) I can attest that controlling Page Title combined with keyword ...
by Steven Webster in General Discussion on 08 Dec 2009 05:07 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
Personally I like separate tabs with unique url for each tabs. It is already there. Only thing I would like to see is more control over the page title. When I go in different tabs the page title is always same. For a social networking site I woul ...
by Tareq in General Discussion on 08 Dec 2009 10:44 AM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
yeah I like it, I am thinking it might provide a decent home url for blogging that did not exist before, not sure about all the blogs for dnn out there but the Ventrian na adapted for blog use does not offer a friendly url for a blogger's home addre ...
by Jason Peterson in General Discussion on 31 Oct 2009 10:44 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
ta (it does look clean in that format - very logical)
by Smart-Thinker in General Discussion on 31 Oct 2009 10:26 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
sure npprofile page - http://domain.com/users/moderatorprofile page with blog tab open - http://domain.com/users/moderator/blog
by Jason Peterson in General Discussion on 31 Oct 2009 10:21 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
Jason, can you paste 2 examples please how it looks with a vanity URL (skip the domain if you don't want to post it) - e.g a profile and a profile with the Info tab or something selected (I want to see if the vanity URL might solve my dilemma)
by Smart-Thinker in General Discussion on 31 Oct 2009 09:18 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
I just got to hooking up vanity url's, what a cinch, and I have to say I am very happy with the url structure of the tabs under the vanity url scheme.
by Jason Peterson in General Discussion on 31 Oct 2009 09:04 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
I'll go along with that. Google has indexed most profiles and tabs on activesocial.com. The tabs rank very well and bring in good traffic. Webmaster tools doesn't have any complaints. Some group tabs rank higher than other optimized pages. Why s ...
by Will Morgenweck in General Discussion on 30 Oct 2009 09:46 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
Posted By Will M on 30 Oct 2009 10:17 PM Why does it have to be good or bad? I have given you actusl use cases. I've told you it can be changed. Your use case is not going to apply to every other Active Social customer. I was not looking for a s ...
by Smart-Thinker in General Discussion on 30 Oct 2009 09:27 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
I really do understand that. I am trying to generate some debate on the best way to do it with SEO in mind. You have to remember that a lot of people do not/would not change the default template, so if you put in a design which may cause negativ ...
by Smart-Thinker in General Discussion on 30 Oct 2009 09:21 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
Why does it have to be good or bad? I have given you actusl use cases. I've told you it can be changed. Your use case is not going to apply to every other Active Social customer.
by Will Morgenweck in General Discussion on 30 Oct 2009 09:17 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
Rodney, you need to take a look at the profile. You don't have to convince on what you want to do. You can do whatever you want, the cability is already in place. Think of the profile view as blank ascx file and do what you want.
by Will Morgenweck in General Discussion on 30 Oct 2009 09:09 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
Ok (for the record, I didn’t say you did – we really need to lose the word AJAX!). All I am saying is that IF profiles are broken up into multiple URLs (by whatever means) – I personally think this will negatively affect SEO. If this is the case I n ...
by Smart-Thinker in General Discussion on 30 Oct 2009 09:08 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
The tabs are not using ajax at all right now. I did not say activesocial.com was using AJAX.
by Will Morgenweck in General Discussion on 30 Oct 2009 09:00 PM
|
|
|
RE: SEO/URL structure for Groups/Users and consequences in indexing
Posted By Will M on 30 Oct 2009 09:27 PM If you choose to enable ajax tabs or preloaded, you will still only have one URL. So this is what is confusing me - on AS it looks like multiple URLs but you say it is not?
by Smart-Thinker in General Discussion on 30 Oct 2009 08:51 PM
|