| Topic |
 |
RE: Using Active Forums for a Question and Answer site Any news on this? It would be awesome to have a Stackexchange replacement directly inside DotNetNuke. I'm also currently using OSQA and trying to integrate it with DotNetNuke (that's how I got here ;-) ). As far as I know, there's no real C#/.NET ba ... by Jashan Chittesh in Will's Blog on 20 Aug 2011 08:14 AM
|
 |
RE: Introducing Frowser - My DotNetNuke Hackathon Entry My users are pestering me for tapatalk so they can get into our AF using thier iPads...any news on this? I got to this blog via a Google search so I noted the thread had stopped about 7 month ago. by sschleiffer in Will's Blog on 07 Aug 2011 06:14 PM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. There has been some good feedback in this topic and definitely some valid concerns. I will spend the next few days working on a way to better communicate the future direction of Active Social. I will also be sure to address questions regarding lic ... by Will Morgenweck in Will's Blog on 25 Feb 2011 10:16 AM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. Blunt feedback: the only thing good i see coming of this: perhaps somebody with an artistic, mac-oriented eye will take over layout and design. AS/AF are classic examples of functionality over form. It is perhaps the least attractive software i buy. ... by drew curry in Will's Blog on 25 Feb 2011 09:30 AM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. And by the way, I fully understand and appreciate why you did this. However, like others "I feel like I was kicked in the gut.". This acquisition has probably taken a few months to arrange, maybe you should have stopped accepting payments when ... by C Poole in Will's Blog on 25 Feb 2011 08:17 AM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. Will, for those of us that need additional lic's for AS in the coming months, what are our options? Are we left in limbo until DNN integrates it or is there some method of acquiring 1 or 2 in the meantime? by C Poole in Will's Blog on 25 Feb 2011 08:12 AM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. This is very good decision. I'm sure, that now everything will run faster and more dynamic. Especially support and bug fixes. Congratulations! by Kossut in Will's Blog on 25 Feb 2011 05:08 AM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. Don't get me wrong.. I'm not trying to be a naysayer or anything.. I have great hopes, but there is also a level of disappointment. by Shad Pulley in Will's Blog on 25 Feb 2011 01:26 AM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. Congratulations Will and company! It seems like a good move on your part. Something that Will says in the blog posting should be something that every Active Modules user thinks about: "One thing is for certain, people have to use DotNetNuke in or ... by Raymond in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 08:25 PM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. Congratulation. How will be provided support for current AF anc AS Enterprise licences? I bought them just a month ago. I hope you will build transfer application for current version data into the new in DNN. by Jozef in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 05:19 PM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. Is this still accurate? http://www.activemodules.com/blogs/...developer/ No, we hired a new developer yesterday. by Will Morgenweck in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 03:17 PM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. Is this still accurate? http://www.activemodules.com/blogs/will/active-modules-is-looking-for-a-senior-web-developer/ by brian in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 03:09 PM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. Also, you guys are missing the point here. DNN's potential for revenue isn't just the $2,000 or so they charge for the pro versions. It's all the money these companies will spend on other DNN support and services. Right now they have thousands ... by SilverSurfer in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 02:19 PM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. For most of you, i can see your point and I truly am hoping that Shaun and Will remain committed to the community as they have stated they are. I think you guys need to accept reality. Whatever Shaun, Will and everyone else did yesterday, or 5 ... by SilverSurfer in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 02:04 PM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. I'd like to reiterate. Send an email to: ceo@dnncorp.com and raise your concerns Discussing it here is good, but unless someone at DNNCorp is aware of our concerns, not much is likely to happen to our satisfaction. AS and AF are dollar signs ... by NFXBeats in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 01:52 PM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. I got on the Active Modules website this morning and was going to renew the yearly updates and support and then run into this. Now, I have been reading all morning concerning the acquisition. I think I am still in disbelief and have many of the sa ... by mcove in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 12:50 PM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. I think that a solution would be to have a lower level DNN product between Community and Pro/Enterprise at at a cost of $300-$500/year. There are thousands of smaller companies/individuals that would sign-up at this level (if the feature set is r ... by Larry in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 11:57 AM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. I think mmoney raises an interesting point. Here is it late Feb-2011 and ActivePurchase was apparently testable months ago, with many promises to a near release date. I committed to a potential new business relationship based on what AP could provid ... by drew curry in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 11:37 AM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. Personally, this is a major blow. Part of the reason I payed for AS is for the stability of the product and because it was well integrated. The support was what brought me over from VivoSocial. Now after investing a huge amount of time and effort in ... by mmoney in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 11:09 AM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. Out of sheer principle, i will not pay for dnn. They screwed us years ago by going commercial, after years of stating they never would. End of story. Another dnn module developer sent me this months ago, worried about their decision to even be in ... by drew curry in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 10:33 AM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. We do some WP but I'm probably less a fan than most using it as a CMS, though I think it's great as a blog engine. As a cms it seems we're always fighting it. While I haven't been around as long as some, we have invested a lot of hours, money and ... by Tyler in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 10:23 AM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. $2000 is crazy. I really have to wonder how many licenses they have sold at that price... It certainly excludes a giant chuck of the potential market. I bet they could sell 10 at $500 for every 1 they sell at $2000. by jbrunken in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 10:16 AM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. It wouldn't be so bad if the Pro version was for more than on install!! $2k for each install.... by brian in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 10:12 AM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. Hey David, thanks for the BuddyPress heads-up, very interesting. Perhaps all this discontent will be managed by one simple post like that. by drew curry in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 08:28 AM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. Why do I feel like I've just been punched in the gut? I have the same feeling - I choose DNN because it provides the foundation and there were a handful of quality third party developers (AM being the primary) I could go to for innovation. Wi ... by DavidE in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 08:08 AM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. Congrats to Will and Co, it sounds like a great opportunity. For me personally DNN carries too many unknowns to develop a long term business around. That's why I recently revisited WordPress and so far have loved what's available. There are s ... by SilverSurfer in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 05:05 AM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. Shad, that's exactly how I feel. And, honestly, nothing good is going to come out of this merger, at least for us customers. by Frozen DNN in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 01:21 AM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. Why do I feel like I've just been punched in the gut? I'm sure there are some positives that will come of this, but my experience is that support is going to suffer, documentation is going to suffer, and ultimately, the module will suffer. I'm a f ... by Shad Pulley in Will's Blog on 24 Feb 2011 12:32 AM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. @Frozen, I don't think Rodney did anything bad by offering the source code for free. On the contrary! He released the code and by that enabled you to hire someone to do the job for you. It's more expensive than using shared support or shared featur ... by goldenrate in Will's Blog on 23 Feb 2011 11:47 PM
|
 |
RE: DotNetNuke Corporation Acquires Active Modules Inc. Hey, I spent time reading this blog and its comments. As a developer I must say that if the source of the modules become available then it's a good thing. We will not need any customization support anymore as we can get all the answers from the s ... by goldenrate in Will's Blog on 23 Feb 2011 11:33 PM
|